Claim of Haug v. Pfortsch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the economic loss rule, if an alleged product malfunction is alleged to have caused purely economic loss, then the end-purchaser is limited to contract claims against the manufacturer and may not seek damages in tort
• reversing grant of leave to amend to add strict liability claim for pure economic injury
• ‘“New York law holds that a negligence action seeking recovery for economic loss will not lie.’ ”
• embracing the views expressed in Justice Silverman's dissenting opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).