Claim of Calderera v. P. Nathan & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the parties to be “competitors or potential competitors” because both relied on play-by-play descriptions of the games in order to attract listeners and enhance their profitability
• finding the parties to be “competitors or potential competitors” because both relied on play-by-play descriptions of the games in order to attract listeners and enhance their profitability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).