Claim of Bukofsky v. Flushing Hospital & Dispensary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for conduct to be “unequivocally referable,” it must be “explainable only with reference to the oral agreement”
• “While the agreement alleged provides a possible motivation for plaintiff’s actions, the performance is equivocal, for it is as reasonably explained by the possibility of other expectations”
• in Statute of Frauds context, “[t]he doctrine of part performance may be invoked only if plaintiffs actions can be characterized as unequivocally referable to the agreement alleged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).