C.L. Taylor, Cross-Appellee v. Texgas Corporation, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, where company itself was sending pension payments to opponent, company could not establish such opposing party’s failure to mention that fact prevented the company from fully and fairly presenting its case
• where the defendant already possessed the information supposedly concealed by the plaintiff, the defendant cannot establish that the plaintiff's failure to reveal that same information prevented it from fully and fairly presenting its case
• where the defendant already possessed the information supposedly concealed by the plaintiff, the defendant cannot establish that the plaintiffs failure to reveal that same information prevented it from fully and fairly presenting its case
• “[Gjiven the fact that Texgas itself knew that it had been making pension payments to Taylor, even if its counsel were not aware of that fact, Texgas cannot show that Taylor’s failure to mention the pension payments prevented Texgas ‘from fully and fairly presenting its case.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).