Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
· 3/31/1989

CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank v. Goldfeld

Citations

  • 709 F. Supp. 472
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3107
  • 1989 WL 30847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing motion to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens, court noted that a cognizable state interest exists when a United States corporation executes securities fraud abroad
  • a cognizable state interest exists when a United States corporation executed securities fraud abroad
  • a cognizable state interest exists when a United States corporation executed securities fraud abroad
  • a cognizable state interest exists when a United States corporation executed securities fraud abroad
  • a cognizable state interest exists when a United States corporation executed securities fraud abroad

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mukasey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.