C.K.R.M. v. K.O.H.

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 3001

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in rejecting appellant's filing, which challenged the trial court's adoption of the magistrate's final civil stalking protection order (\CSPO\). If construed as a motion to terminate and vacate the CSPO, appellant did not provide a valid basis for the motion. If construed as objections and deemed timely due to lack of service, appellant failed to file a transcript to support his objections, and we would presume the regularity of the trial court's proceedings. Judgment affirmed.