CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, MTR. OF

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Teachers’ withheld interest was being used “to pay benefits to other members”
• finding Rooker-Feldman did not bar claims because 2 “[n]o state-court judgment resolved the precise issues presented in this case, and the [plaintiffs] do 3 not complain of any error by the state court or seek relief from the state court’s judgments”
• “DRS’s withholding of the interest accrued on the Teachers’ accounts constitutes a per se taking to which [a federal] prudential ripeness test does not apply. The district court erred in dismissing the Teachers’ takings claim as prudentially unripe.”
• “It is a forbidden de facto appeal under Rooker—Feldman when the plaintiff in federal district court complains of a legal wrong allegedly committed by the state court, and seeks relief from the judgment of that court.’” (citation omitted)
• “Williamson County applies only to regulatory, not per se, takings.”
• declining to apply finality requirement to per se takings claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).