Civil Liberties for Urban Believers v. City of Chicago, Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in context of RLUIPA's broad definition of religious exercise, a land use regulation that imposes a substantial burden on religious exercise is one that renders that exercise \effectively impracticable\
• abandoning the definition in Mack v. O'Leary, 80 F.3d 1175 (7th Cir.1996)
• expenditure of even \considerable\ time and money to engage in permit approval process was not a substantial burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).