Ciuferi v. Bullock Mining Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that rules of the AEC which did not require a detailed statement in an uncontested licensing proceeding did not comply with Section 102(2) (C)
• holding that rules of the AEC which did not require a detailed statement in an uncontested licensing proceeding did not comply with Section 102(2) (C)
• “It is, moreover, unrealistic to assume that there will always be an inter-venor with the information, energy and money required to challenge a staff recommendation which ignores environmental costs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).