Skip to main content
· 1/28/2003

City Pages v. State

Citations

  • 655 N.W.2d 839
  • 31 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1498
  • 2003 Minn. App. LEXIS 72
  • 2003 WL 177071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that billing records “are not protected in their entirety” by the attorney-client privilege
  • parties claiming attorney-client privilege must show its application to particular narrative statements in billing records
  • “Because billing records are not ‘communication made by the client,’ they come under the privilege only if they are ‘attorney’s advice given [on a client’s communication] in the course of professional duty.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klaphake, Kalitowski, Forsberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.