City of Yuma v. Lattie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the right to compensation for loss of access is “limited only by the exercise of a city’s police power.”
• interpreting Arizona cases and stating that Article 2, Section 17 “requires that just compensation be paid by a city ... where the easement of ingress or egress of a property owner is substantially impaired”
• “If [a governmental entity] fails to institute an eminent domain action and private property is taken or damaged for public use, Article 2, Section 17 of the Constitution is self-executing and the right to bring an inverse eminent domain action vests in the property owner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).