Skip to main content
· 8/22/1995

City of Wilkes-Barre v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 664 A.2d 90
  • 541 Pa. 435
  • 1995 Pa. LEXIS 617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that “[a]fter reviewing [the doctor’s] testimony in its entirety, ... we conclude that the lower court disregarded significant portions of the deposition and that the medical testimony was competent.”
  • firefighter who showed he had \been exposed to fumes and other hazards as a fireman\ entitled to the presumption that his heart disease arose from exposure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, C.J., and Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille and Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.