Skip to main content
· 9/11/1986

City of Wichita v. Hull

Citations

  • 724 P.2d 699
  • 11 Kan. App. 2d 441
  • 1986 Kan. App. LEXIS 1401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that involuntary intoxication defense was properly denied where defendant drove after taking sleeping pill
  • holding that involuntary intoxication defense was properly denied where defendant drove after taking sleeping pill
  • charge of driving while under the influence of drugs may be proven by circumstantial evidence that defendant consumed drugs and that he was driving erratically
  • charge of driving while under the influence of drugs may be proven by circumstantial evidence that defendant consumed drugs and that he was driving erratically
  • defendant could not claim involuntary intoxication from driving under the influence while on sleeping pills
  • driving while under the influence, K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 8-1567

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rees, Parks, Briscoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.