· 9/11/1986
City of Wichita v. Hull
Citations
- 724 P.2d 699
- 11 Kan. App. 2d 441
- 1986 Kan. App. LEXIS 1401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that involuntary intoxication defense was properly denied where defendant drove after taking sleeping pill
- holding that involuntary intoxication defense was properly denied where defendant drove after taking sleeping pill
- charge of driving while under the influence of drugs may be proven by circumstantial evidence that defendant consumed drugs and that he was driving erratically
- charge of driving while under the influence of drugs may be proven by circumstantial evidence that defendant consumed drugs and that he was driving erratically
- defendant could not claim involuntary intoxication from driving under the influence while on sleeping pills
- driving while under the influence, K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 8-1567
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rees, Parks, Briscoe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.