City of Waterbury v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CHRO lacked jurisdiction to hold hearing because it had not undertaken any of required procedural steps, including conducting preliminary investigation and establishing reasonable cause
• “[An administrative body] cannot modify, abridge or otherwise change the statutory provisions under which it acquires authority unless the statutes expressly grant it that power.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).