City of Virginia Beach v. Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, when “interpreting art. 1, § 11 of the Constitution of Virginia, [the Supreme Court of Virginia] [has] cited to and sought guidance from cases involving takings under the Fifth Amendment”
• where the regulation predated the landowner’s acquisition of the property, “the ‘bundle of rights’ which [the landowner] acquired upon obtaining title to the property did not include the right to develop the lots without restrictions”
• corporation, not stockholder, was owner of property for purposes of takings analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).