City of Vernon v. Southern California Edison Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a conspiracy to restrain trade may exist “even where one of the conspirators participates involuntarily or under coercion”
• stating that restraint of trade evaluated under either per se or rule of reason test
• where plaintiffs failed to put forward “proper proof of damages at all . . . the district court did not err when it awarded summary judgment based upon this lack of evidence”
• “[T]here is no indication of what part of that $80,000 loss of savings was due to proper interruptions of service and what part to improper ones, or for that matter, due to other factors entirely.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).