City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding because findings failed to address issues necessary to review the court’s application of the law
• replacement of billboard’s existing twin I beam support structure with new unipole structure was not reasonable repair
• cities do “not have vested rights in [their] zoning powers, and the state can reduce or condition those powers”
• “The City’s power to enact zoning ordinances derives exclusively from the state.”
• replacement of billboard support structure extinguishes legal status of nonconforming billboard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).