· 1/23/1976
City of Tucson v. SUP. CT., IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMA
Citations
- 544 P.2d 1113
- 25 Ariz. App. 512
- 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 496
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an in camera inquiry “protects information from improper disclosure and at the same time gives a litigant access to essential information”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Krucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.