Skip to main content
· 1/23/1976

City of Tucson v. SUP. CT., IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMA

Citations

  • 544 P.2d 1113
  • 25 Ariz. App. 512
  • 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an in camera inquiry “protects information from improper disclosure and at the same time gives a litigant access to essential information”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Krucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.