· 10/14/1997
City of Tucson v. State
Citations
- 957 P.2d 341
- 191 Ariz. 436
- 254 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 19
- 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting statement of intent entitled to deference; then analyzing magnitude of statewide concern
- noting statement of intent entitled to deference; then analyzing magnitude of statewide concern
- noting statement of intent entitled to deference; then analyzing magnitude of statewide concern
- in determining whether concern is statewide or local, court gives some deference to statement of legislative intent
- in determining whether concern is statewide or local, court gives some deference to statement of legislative intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Pelander, Espinosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.