City of Tucson v. Pima County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that requiring communities in “urbanized areas” to get the City’s consent to hold an election did not violate the Equal Protection Clause because “[a]ll persons within the area which is the object of incorporation [were] treated equally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).