Skip to main content
· 2/17/1966

City of Tucson v. Holliday

Citations

  • 411 P.2d 183
  • 3 Ariz. App. 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • error for trial court to instruct on future medical expenses where physician offered both an “optimistic” view that plaintiff would need no further treatment and a “pessimistic” view that her permanent disability would require future treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Molloy, Krucker, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.