City of Tucson v. Citizens Utilities Water Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting, as “speculative[,]” opinion of expert who provided no “authority” for his opinion and was “at a loss” to explain it on cross- examination
• “Mere speculation and arbitrary conclusions are not substantial evidence and cannot be determinative.”
• “Mere speculation and arbitrary conclusions are not substantial evidence and cannot be determinative.”
• mere speculation not substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).