Skip to main content
· 6/11/1912

City of Stanford v. Aldridge

Citations

  • 148 Ky. 848
  • 147 S.W. 749
  • 1912 Ky. LEXIS 537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]here the losing party takes an 4 “Rule 62(b) was formerly Rule 62(d).” Georgiev v. Adsad, LLC, No. 19-CV-122, 2021 WL 3159853, at n.1 (S.D.N.Y. June 21, 2021
  • “In the typical case, deferring a ruling on a motion for attorneys’ fees until the Second Circuit resolves a merits appeal ensures that the Court only has to address the motion for attorneys’ fees by the party that ultimately prevails.”
  • “In the typical case, deferring a ruling on a motion for attorneys’ fees until the Second Circuit resolves a merits appeal ensures that the Court only has to address the motion for attorneys’ fees by the party that ultimately prevails.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.