City of St. Paul v. Mulnix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction for violating municipal disorderly-conduct ordinance in the face of constitutional challenge based on the defendant’s “shouting and screaming” of profanities
• adopting a narrowing construction of an ordinance that used the word “disturbance”
• defendant screamed that she would wait until bartender got off work and kick her “f* * *ing ass all over town”
• affirmance of conviction for shouting obscenities along with conduct of a disorderly nature under St. Paul ordinance prohibiting “noise, riot, disturbance or improper diversion, to the annoyance or disturbance of the citizens, or other persons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).