City of St. Paul v. Greene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a system of successive forgeries or of successive cheats or swindles of the same general nature” is admissible to show “that the defendant had been engaged in practicing like or similar cheats, as tending to prove a criminal intent” (citation omitted
• “Evidence tending to show only propensity or disposition is inadmissible under any statement of the rule”
• \Evidence tending to show only propensity or disposition is inadmissible under any statement of the rule\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).