City of Springfield v. DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that G. L. c. 166A, § 2, governs “appeals seeking judicial review of decisions of the Department of Telecommunications and Cable” in context of appeal by cable television service provider from cable rate decision
• “Because of its specialized knowledge, technical competence, and experience in the cable television industry, the department possesses the expertise to determine whether the language in question constitutes a term of art in that industry”
• “Because of its specialized knowledge, technical competence, and experience in the cable television industry, the department possesses the expertise to determine whether the language in question constitutes a term of art in that industry”
• “In light of the deference we give to the department’s expertise and experience, particularly where this interpretive question arises under a complex statutory and regulatory framework, we conclude that the department’s interpretation ... is soundly based”
• involving a cable television service provider license
• involving a cable television service provider license

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).