City of South Euclid v. Palladino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 24 encouragement to oppose development was protected by the right to petition the 25 government for redress of grievances
• stating that appellate court ordinarily will not consider matters \not specifically and distinctly argued in appellant's opening brief.\
• stating that appellate court ordinarily will not 23 consider matters “not specifically and distinctly argued in 24 appellant's opening brief.”
• stating that appellate court ordinarily will not 23 consider matters “not specifically and distinctly argued in 24 appellant's opening brief.”
• explaining how a plaintiff can establish a “prima facie ease of disparate impact under the FHA”
• “This Court will not ordinarily consider matters on appeal that are not specifically and distinctly argued in appellant’s opening brief.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).