· 7/29/1975
City of So. Burlington v. Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc.
Citations
- 344 A.2d 19
- 133 Vt. 438
- 1975 Vt. LEXIS 427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that electric generation facility was not required to secure a municipal zoning permit for a facility already sanctioned by the PSB through a certificate of public good
- holding municipal zoning regulation of transmission line preempted by state regulatory authority
- holding municipal zoning regulation of transmission line preempted by state regulatory authority
- “ ‘Due consideration’ for municipal legislative bodies ... at least impliedly postulates that municipal enactments, in the specific area, are advisory rather than controlling.”
- “ ‘Due consideration’ for municipal legislative bodies . . . at least impliedly postulates that municipal enactments, in the specific area, are advisory rather than controlling.”
- “‘Due consideration’ for municipal legislative bodies . . . at least impliedly postulates that municipal enactments, in the specific area, are advisory rather than controlling . . . . Any attempt at municipal regulation is pre‐empted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Smith, Daley, Larrow, Billings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.