Skip to main content
· 9/22/2006

City of Skagway v. Robertson

Citations

  • 143 P.3d 965
  • 2006 Alas. LEXIS 142
  • 2006 WL 2709543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding facial challenge, without discussing ripeness, to city ordinance limiting in-person solicitation by plaintiffs who owned businesses that used in-person solicitation, although they had not yet been prosecuted or threatened with prosecution
  • deciding facial challenge, without discussing ripeness, to city ordinance limiting in-person solicitation by plaintiffs who owned businesses that used in-person solicitation, although they had not yet been prosecuted or threatened with prosecution
  • applying rule to interpretation of a municipal ordinance
  • applying rule to interpretation of a municipal ordinance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.