City of Shawnee, Kan. v. AT & T CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the continuing trespass doctrine to the presence of a cable transmitting pulses of information and determining that the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the trespass was removed
• noting AT & T did not brief issue of intangible trespass
• noting AT & T did not brief issue of intangible trespass
• \AT & T's cable constitutes a permanent trespass. The cable is not a temporary structure. Removal requires earthmoving equipment.\
• \AT & T’s cable constitutes a permanent trespass. The cable is not a temporary structure. Removal requires earthmoving equipment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).