City of Seattle v. Seibert

Citations

• 129 Wash. 346
• 225 P. 67

Syllabus

<p>Municipal Corporations (326) — Constitutional Law — Nuisances — Abatement oe Eire Hazard — Ordinances — Validity — Vested Rights. Where a property owner maintained a fire hazard in violation of a general fire hazard ordinance, a special ordinance applying to him alone, and declaring a nuisance is not invalid, in so far as it directs the corporation counsel to abate it by legal proceedings, nor because it provided a different method for abatement than that provided in the general ordinance, so long as the property owner had notice and his day in court; there being no vested right in a particular remedy.</p>