City of Seattle v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that irreparable harm 15 may be “difficult to valuate,” in holding that this element of a claim for injunctive relief may be 16 established by such difficulty of valuation
• applying federal standards to determine whether a preliminary injunction should issue but applying state law to the merits of the underlying contract claim
• “[E]conomic injury alone does not support a finding of irreparable harm, 24 because such injury can be remedied by a damage award.” (internal citation omitted)
• “It is true that economic injury alone does not support a 24 finding of irreparable harm, because such injury can be remedied by a damage award.”
• “The district court has broad discretion 12 in deciding what constitutes proper rebuttal evidence.”
• loss of goodwill is a compensable injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).