City of Seattle v. Carnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statement “lack of a ‘sufficient foundation” without “indicat[ion of] what specific foundational requirement was lacking” does not preserve error for appeal
• holding that the statement “lack of a ‘sufficient foundation” without “indicat[ion of] what specific foundational requirement was lacking” is insufficient to preserve error for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).