City of Seagoville v. Lytle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]o the extent [the employee’s] request for an injunction seeks a money judgment for the unspecified, back benefits, that claim is barred by governmental immunity.”
• mandamus to restore officer to position and pay grade not barred by immunity but mandamus seeking back pay is a claim for money damages that is barred by immunity
• petition for mandamus seeking back pay was claim for money damages
• “We con-elude the portion of Lytle’s declaratory judgment action that seeks withdrawal of the disciplinary action and reinstatement to his original position and pay grade does not seek an award of money damages and is not barred by governmental immunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).