Skip to main content
· 7/13/1978

City of Scottsdale v. Scottsdale Associated Merchants, Inc.

Citations

  • 583 P.2d 891
  • 120 Ariz. 4
  • 1978 Ariz. LEXIS 254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • invalidating a Scottsdale ordinance that conflicted with Arizona law on a sign-regulation issue
  • municipality that has been delegated power to enact zoning ordinance “must strictly comply” with state statute that provides for the method of eliminating nonconforming uses
  • “When the subject of legislation is a matter of statewide concern the Legislature has the power to bind all throughout the state[.]”
  • ordinance of charter city concerning nonconforming signs conflicted with controlling state statute and was therefore void
  • “Charter cities have certain rights and privileges in local matters to legislate free from interference by the legislature. When the subject of legislation is a matter of statewide concern the Legislature has the power to bind all throughout the state including charter cities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Struckmeyer, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.