City of Scottsdale v. Mocho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring “clear, satisfactory and unequivocal proof that there was an intent by the platter to dedicate for a proper public purpose, either expressed or implied”
• requiring “clear, satisfactory and unequivocal proof that there was an intent by the platter to dedicate for a proper public purpose, either expressed or implied”
• subdivider did not intend common-law, or plat dedication of parking lot to local government where use contemplated was not for general public but for a limited clientele
• evidence of public dedication must be “clear, satisfactory and unequivocal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).