Skip to main content
· 8/24/1976

City of Scottsdale v. Deem

Citations

  • 556 P.2d 328
  • 27 Ariz. App. 480
  • 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding apparent low bid contractor is not entitled to maintain action for lost profits after contract erroneously awarded to another was completed and that proper remedy is by special action
  • the rationale of the law is that the authority for letting public contracts is derived for the public benefit and is not intended as a direct benefit to the contractor
  • \misfeasance of public officials in failing to award the contract to the lowest bidder should not be a source of double vexation to the public\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ogg, Donofrio, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.