City of San Francisco v. Pacific Bank
Citations
- 89 Cal. 23
- 26 P. 615
- 1891 Cal. LEXIS 759
Syllabus
<p>Bill of Exceptions — General Exception to Decision—Appeal—Review of Evidence. •— A bill of exceptions, containing only a general exception to the decision and order of the court for entry of judgment, without any specification of particulars, is insufficient, under section 648 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to authorize the appellate court to examine the evidence for the purpose of determining its sufficiency to justify the findings.</p> <p>Rehearing. — The supreme court will not consider a petition for a rehearing that attempts to discuss the case upon grounds which were not presented in the original argument or discussed in its opinion.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘Failure to make the required showing of either deficient performance or sufficient prejudice defeats the ineffectiveness claim.’” (citation omitted)
- trial court’s remedy of giving trial counsel time to review records was not an abuse of discretion where the expert’s allegations were not a surprise and did not alter the defense theory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.