Skip to main content
· 7/1/1861

City of San Francisco v. Beideman

Citations

  • 17 Cal. 443

Syllabus

<p>The bill in this case to enjoin a sale of real estate was held cot to be a bill to quiet title under the two hundred and forty-eighth section of the Practice Act, because plaintiff is not in possession ; nor a bill to remove or prevent cloud of title, because, under the averments, no cloud can be created within Pixley v. Huggins, 15 Cal. 127.</p> <p>Nor can the bill be maintained upon the ground of preventing a multiplicity of suits. A single action of ejectment, in which all the tenants of defendant could be made parties, would determine the title ; and a notice of lis pendens filed would bind purchasers from the defendant.</p> <p>Nor can the title be maintained on the ground of a trust; for, assuming that the municipal lands within the city of San Francisco were conveyed by the city to the Fund Commissioners, in trust for her creditors, and that this trust was a portion of a contract, or so connected with the obligation of a contract as that the property was unalterably fixed by that disposition of it, the city would still have the equity of redemption at least, and could dispose of the subject of the •trust, with the assent of the Legislature, subject only to the rights of the ' creditors or their trustees; or the Legislature, as the paramount political authority, could authorize or make such disposition. But the title thus disposed of would go to the grantee, who would hold the land, subject only to the trust. The city could not enjoin a sale of the property by the grantee, or interfere with his use or possession of it, until it became.necessary to enforce the trust.</p> <p>This Court has not decided that a voluntary appropriation, by public act, of property or its proceeds, by a municipal body, when such appropriation is not associated With a contract as part of its obligation or sanction, remove's such property or proceeds from the control of the municipal body or the Legislature, or thaPthe terms of the act making the appropriation are unalterable.</p> <p>

Judges: Baldwin, Cope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.