Skip to main content
· 6/29/2012

City of San Diego v. Haas

Citations

  • 207 Cal. App. 4th 472
  • 143 Cal. Rptr. 3d 438
  • 2012 WL 2476876
  • 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The evidence is sufficient, as a matter of law, to establish that [surreptitiously filming plaintiffs in the restroom] caused plaintiffs severe emotional distress.”
  • “Here, [defendant’s] conduct in installing a video camera in a workplace restroom in order to surreptitiously view and record the plaintiffs while they used the restroom is conduct which is unquestionably outrageous and extreme.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nares

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.