City of San Antonio v. Hartman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Act provides a few exceptions \in which its waiver provisions do not apply\
• holding “an emergency situation existed as a matter of law”
• “We must construe this statute according to what it says, not according to what we think it should have said.”
• “conscious indifference” and “reckless disregard” have been interpreted to require proof that a party knew the relevant facts but did not care about the result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).