City of San Antonio v. Hardee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the landowners lacked standing to challenge annexation based on 9 procedural violations of Section 43.052, the City Charter, and the City Code
• stating that if legislature wanted to exempt annexation challenges from mandamus and injunctive remedies provided for violations of Open Meetings Act, it could have done so, but did not
• stating that if legislature wanted to exempt annexation challenges from mandamus and injunctive remedies provided for violations of Open Meetings Act, it could have done so, but did not
• listing the few statutory limitations on a city’s annexation authority as of that date
• listing the few statutory limitations on a city’s annexation authority as of that date
• Historically, a review of an individual party's standing to challenge annexation inquires whether the challenge attacks a city's authority to annex the area in question or simply complains of some violation of statutory procedure.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).