City of Richmond v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that the employee manual included information on how to deal with questions related to relationship with the infringing company sheds light as to doubtful state of the public mind on this question and on the frequency with which the question was raised
• finding SIMMONS and SIMMONDS essentially identical in sound

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).