City of Richardson v. Responsible Dog Owners of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the mere fact that the legislature has enacted a law addressing a subject does not mean that the subject matter is completely preempted\
• stating that an ordinance governing an activity which is wholly proscribed under the Texas Penal Code is preempted under section 1.08
• “Lacking agreement among parts; not compatible with another fact or claim.”
• “Lacking agreement among parts; not compatible with another fact or claim.”
• \[T]he mere fact that the legislature has enacted a law addressing a subject does not mean that the subject matter is completely preempted.\
• home-rule cities have broad discretionary powers provided that no ordinance conflicts with the Texas Constitution or state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).