City of Rialto v. West Coast Loading Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that McNary allowed the petitioners to challenge a policy that was collateral to their substantive eligibility for relief
• recognizing that McNary allowed the petitioners to challenge a policy that was collateral to their substantive eligibility for relief
• finding that district court lacked jurisdiction over claim that “[l]ike the claims in Ringer ... [was] nothing more than a request for direct review of the validity” of a UAO
• finding that plaintiff lacked prudential standing to raise claims of third parties
• characterizing GE II as holding only that “a facial challenge was not barred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).