Skip to main content
· 3/31/2011

City of Reno v. Building & Construction Trades Council

Citations

  • 251 P.3d 718
  • 127 Nev. 114
  • 127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 10
  • 2011 Nev. LEXIS 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that our role in reviewing an agency decision is identical to the district court's and \[Nv]e do not give any deference to the district court decision when reviewing an order regarding a petition for judicial review\
  • observing that our role in reviewing an agency decision is identical to the district court’s and “[w]le do not give any deference to the district court decision when reviewing an order regarding a petition for judicial review”
  • “We do not give any deference to the district court decision when reviewing an order regarding a petition for judicial review.”
  • \[T]his court will not read statutory language in a manner that produces absurd or unreasonable results.\ (internal quotation omitted)
  • \[T]his court will not read statutory language in a manner that produces absurd or unreasonable results.\ (internal quotation omitted)
  • \[TIhis court will not read statutory language in a manner that produces absurd or unreasonable results.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Douglas, Gibbons, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Pickering, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.