City of Racine v. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the Court of Appeals’ opinion in part and reversing the Court of Appeals’ opinion in part because “a portion of the majority opinion was erroneously designated a dissent, while a portion of the dissent was found in what purported to be the majority opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).