City of Pullman v. Glover

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he extent of the taking may be no greater than is reasonably necessary for the stated public purpose.\
• “[T]he extent of the taking may be no greater than is reasonably necessary for the stated public purpose.”
• “In fact, the extent of the taking may be no greater than is reasonably necessary for the stated public purpose.”
• lessee whose interest would not be \materially affected\
• “Extent of Interest Acquired, [1]—Reasonable Necessity Rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).