City of Princeton v. Stamper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• approving ordinance imposing fee on the collection and removal of residential refuse regardless of actual use as a reasonable and valid exercise of the police powers granted to the City of Princeton under W.Va.Code, 8-13-13 (1971)
• ordinance imposing fee on the collection and removal of residential refuse regardless of actual use is a reasonable and valid exercise of the police powers granted to the City of Princeton under W.Va.Code § 8-13-13 (1971)
• ordinance imposing fee on the collection and removal of residential refuse regardless of actual use is a reasonable and valid exercise of the police powers granted to the City of Princeton under W.Va. Code § 8-13-13 (1971)
• ordinance imposing fee on the collection and removal of residential refuse regardless of actual use is a reasonable and valid exercise of the police powers granted to the City of Princeton under W. Va. Code, 8-13-13 [1971]
• “‘[W]hen the language of a statute is clear and unambiguous, the courts will apply, not construe [sic] such language.’ ” (quoting Rite Aid of W. Va., Inc. v. City of Charleston, 189 W.Va. 707, 709, 434 S.E.2d 379, 381 (1993) (citation omitted))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).