City of Prattville v. Post

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim of promissory fraud based on an implied or negligent representation \could not be sustained\
• holding that, because promissory fraud required proof that the defendant did not intend to perform the act promised and had an intent to deceive, a claim of promissory fraud based on an implied or negligent representation \could not be sustained....\
• holding that, because promissory fraud required proof that the defendant did not intend to perform the act promised and had an intent to deceive, a claim of promissory fraud based on an implied or negligent representation “could not be sustained .... ”
• holding that, because promissory fraud required proof that the defendant did not intend to perform the act promised and had an intent to deceive, a claim of promissory fraud based on an implied or negligent representation 'could not be sustained ....'
• holding that, because promissory fraud required proof that the defendant did not intend to perform the act promised and had an intent to deceive, a claim of promissory fraud based on an implied or negligent representation “could not be sustained . . . .”
• holding that, because promissory fraud required proof that the defendant did not intend to perform the act promised and had an intent to deceive, a claim of promissory fraud based on an implied or negligent representation “could not be sustained . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).